Abstract

In material removal processes, determination of optimal machining strategy is a key factor to increase productivity. This situation is gaining more importance when machining components with complex geometry. The current practice in the determination of machining strategy mostly depends on the experience of the machine operator. However, poorly designed machining processes lead to time-consuming and costly solutions. Therefore, the improvement of machining processes plays a vital role in terms of machining costs. In this study, the machining process of a boom-body connector (GGG40) of a backhoe loader was improved. Improvements of toolpaths and cutting conditions of 22 different material removal processes were checked through a CAM software. According to the simulation results, the process plan was rearranged. Besides, some enhancements in casting model were conducted to decrease in the number of machining operations. When compared to current practice, a reduction of 55% in machining time was achieved.

References

[1] Groover MP, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems,4th ed. New York, ABD: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
[2] Yusup N, Zain AM, Hashim SZM. Evolutionary techniques in optimizing machiningparameters: Review and recent applications (2007-2011). Expert Systems with Applications2012;39(10):9909-27.
[3] Baskar N, Asokan P, Prabhaharan G, Saravanan R. Optimization of machining parametersfor milling operations using non-conventional methods. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol2005;25(11-12):1078-88.
[4] Rodriguez-Alabanda O, Bonilla M, Guerrero-Vaca G, Romero P. Selection of parametersand strategies to reduce energy consumption and improve surface quality in EN-AW 7075molds machining. Metals 2018; 8(9):688.
[5] Jerard RB, Fussell BK, Hemmett JG, Ercan MT, “Toolpath feedrate optimization: A casestudy. Proc. 2000 NSF Design & Manufacturing Research Conference, ancouver, BritishColumbia, Canada 2000; 3-6.
[6] Gologlu C, Sakarya N. The effects of cutter path strategies on surface roughness of pocketmilling of 1.2738 steel based on Taguchi method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008;206(1-3):7-15.
[7] Sales HR, Amirabadi H., Hosseinabadi HN, Bagheri MR, Experimental study of tool pathstrategies for three and five axes milling along with feed rate optimization, Indian J. Sci.Technol. 2016;9(43):1-12.
[8] Jarosz K, Löschner P, Nieslony P, Krolczyk G, Optimization of CNC face milling processof Al-6061-T6 aluminum alloy. Journal of Machine Engineering 2017;17(1), 69-77.
[9] Souza AF, Machado A, Beckert SF, Diniz AE. Evaluating the roughness according to thetool path strategy when milling free form surfaces for mold application. Procedia CIRP2014;14:188-93.
[10] “Pi makina-1.”
[Online]. Available: https://pimakina.com.tr/is-makinasi. 19 October 2019.
[11] MasterCAM.2018. CNC Software, Inc., Tolland, Connecticut, US.