The Academic Perspective Procedia publishes Academic Platform symposiums papers as three volumes in a year. DOI number is given to all of our papers.
Publisher : Academic Perspective
Journal DOI : 10.33793/acperpro
Journal eISSN : 2667-5862
Year :2018, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages: 115-129
09.11.2018
Evaluation of Cadastral Work Done Using Total Station Instrument
Total station has become the main tool in most engineering work. Accordingly, evaluation of this work has gained a significant importance. A methodology to evaluate precision of cadastral work done using total station is presented here. The used technique is based on propagation of random errors of quantities measured by total station; i.e., distance and both horizontal and vertical angles. Random error in distance is produced by EDM unit integrated into total station. Whereas, random errors in horizontal and vertical angles are produced by theodolite integrated unit. Moreover, backsight process conducted in field results in addition random error in horizontal angles. This research studies how the above errors affect the resulted rectangular coordinates measured by total station for each observed point. Experiments were done using both simulated and real datasets. Results showed that the calculated errors were close to the expected errors and did not exceed the allowable ones.
Keywords:
Total station, random error evaluation, quality assurance, land surveying
References
[1] Baykal, O., Tari, E., Coskun, Z., and Erden, T. Accuracy of Point Layout with Polar Coordinates. ASCE, Journal of Surveying Engineering, Volume 131, Issue 3 (87 – 93), 2005.
[2] Kananagh, B. and Mastin, T. Surveying Principles and Applications. 9th Edition, Pearson, USA, 2014.
[3] Mao, J. M. and Nindl D. Surveying Reflectors –White Paper: Characteristics and Influence. Leica Geosystem AG, Heerburgg, Switzerland, 2009.
[4] Martin, D. and Gatta G. Calibration of Total Station Instrument at the ESRF. Shaping the Change, XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany, 2006.
[5] Mikhail, E. M. and Ackermann F. E. Observations and Least Squares. 2nd Edition, University Press of America, USA, 1982.
[6] Mikhail, E. M. and Gracie, G. Analysis & Adjustment of Survey Measurements. 2nd Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., USA, 1981.
[7] Office of the Surveyor-General Victoria. EDM Calibration Handbook. 16th Edition, Land Use Victoria, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Australia, 2017.
[8] RICS Guidance Note. EDM Calibration. 2nd Edition, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), UK, 2007.
[9] Schofield, W. and Beach, M. Engineering Surveying. 6th Edition, Elsevier, UK, 2007.
[10] Sokkia. Series 10 Set210 Electronic Total Station Operator's Manual. 4th Edition, Sokkia Co., Ltd., Japan, 2001.
[11] Uren, J. and Price, B. Surveying for Engineers. 5th Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, UK, 2010.
Cite
@article{acperproISITES2018ID24, author={Aldelgawy, Mohammed}, title={Evaluation of Cadastral Work Done Using Total Station Instrument}, journal={Academic Perspective Procedia}, eissn={2667-5862}, volume={1}, year=2018, pages={115-129}}
Aldelgawy, M.. (2018). Evaluation of Cadastral Work Done Using Total Station Instrument. Academic Perspective Procedia, 1 (1), 115-129. DOI: 10.33793/acperpro.01.01.24
%0 Academic Perspective Procedia (ACPERPRO) Evaluation of Cadastral Work Done Using Total Station Instrument% A Mohammed Aldelgawy% T Evaluation of Cadastral Work Done Using Total Station Instrument% D 11/9/2018% J Academic Perspective Procedia (ACPERPRO)% P 115-129% V 1% N 1% R doi: 10.33793/acperpro.01.01.24% U 10.33793/acperpro.01.01.24