Abstract

When the behaviors of the structures under the earthquake effect are examined, they are assumed as fixed foundation. Since the differentiation of the soil characteristics effects the behavior of the structures, the soil structure interaction should be taken into account in the earthquake analyzes. The main objective of this research is to examine the soil structure interaction. In this research, the masonry structure with two stories constructed from the stone material is handled. In addition to this, the soil is taken into consideration as sand, clay, rock, and fixed support. The masonry structure with two stories and the different soil layers have been modeledthree-dimensionally by with SAP 2000 program. In the scope of research, Kobe ground motion data was applied to the soil-masonry structure systems by using time history method in the analysis.

References

[1] Kausel, E. (2010). Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(9), 822-832.
[2] Wang, H. F., Lou, M. L., Chen, X., &Zhai, Y. M. (2013). Structure–soil–structure interaction between underground structure and ground structure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 54, 31-38.
[3] Wolf, J. P. (1985). Dynamic SoilStructure Interaction. PrenticeHall. Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
[4] Karabörk, T., &Doğuş, S. (2005). Zemin özelliklerinin çok katlı yapıların dinamik davranışı üzerine etkisi. Deprem Sempozyumu, Kocaeli, 1108-1113.
[5] Sica, S., &Pecce, M. R. (2013). Soil structure interaction on the dynamic behavior of two historic masonry structures. In 2nd International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering for the Preservation of Monuments and Historic Sites; Napoli; Italy (pp. 657-667). CRC Press/Balkema.
[6] Oyguç, R. A. (2017). 2011 Van depremlerinden sonra yığma yapılarda gözlemlenen hasarlar. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 296-315.
[7] Garip Z.Ş. (2005). Deprem etkisindeki betonarme yapılarda yapı zemin etkileşimi, Yüksek LisansTezi, SAÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya, Ocak.
[8] Pampal, S. (2000). Depremler’, Alfa BasımYayım Dağıtım, İstanbul, Ocak.
[9] Garip Z. Ş. (2017). Yumuşak Kat Düzensizliği olan Betonarme Binalarda Yapı Zemin Etkileşimi, 5th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science, 29-30 September.
[10]Kutanis, M. (2001). Yapı-Zemin Dinamik Etkileşimi, DoktaraTezi, SAÜ FBE, Sakarya, Kasım.
[11] Kramer, S. L. (2003). Geoteknik Deprem Mühendisliği, Ankara Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi, Fersa Matbaacılık,Ankara,s.321-334.
[12] Karabörk, T. (2009). Yapı-Zemin Etkileşimi Dikkate Alınarak Betonarme Yapıların Doğrusal Olmayan 3 Boyutlu Dinamik Analizi. YapıTeknolojileriElektronikDergisi, 5(1), 25-36.
[13] Lysmer, J., &Kuhlemeyer, R. L. (1969). Finite dynamic model for infinite media. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 95(4), 859-878.
[14] Lou, M., Wang, H., Chen, X., &Zhai, Y. (2011). Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(12), 1724-1731.
[15] Elmas M., Kutanis M., (1997) ‘Yer hareketi etkisindeki zemin yapı sistemlerinin üç boyutlu sonlu elemanlarla modellenerek incelenmesi.’ SAÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 1, 41-47.
[16] Gaikwad, M. V., Ghogare, R. B., &Vageesha, S. M. (2015). Finite element analysis of frame with soil structure interaction. Int. J. of Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(1), 91-94.
[17] Karaca, Z., Kasımzade, A. A., & Ak, M. (2007). Zemin fiziksel parametreleri ile zemin yatak kat sayıları arasındaki bağlantı ve zemin yapı etkileşiminde uygulama. Zemin Mekaniği ve Temel Mühendisliği, 1.
[18] Vicencio, F., & Alexander, N. A. (2018). Dynamic interaction between adjacent buildings through nonlinear soil during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 108,130-141.
[19] Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, PEER Strong Motion Database., http://peer.berkeley.edu
[20]Wilson, E. ve Habibullah A., (1998). ‘SAP 2000 Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures Basic Analysis.