Abstract

In large-scale disasters that disrupt societal functions, the expertise of orthopedic and traumatology specialists plays a critical role in managing a substantial proportion of injuries. However, the effective and efficient utilization of available resources in the aftermath of such events necessitates the establishment of a rapid and dynamic organizational framework among healthcare institutions, tailored to the specific characteristics of the disaster. Despite the existence of disaster management regulations issued by relevant ministries, particularly the Ministry of Health, as well as earthquake monitoring and information systems developed by AFAD, there is currently no actively utilized system capable of coordinating and informing healthcare institutions and medical professionals within minutes following a disaster. A systematic approach that involves the identification, categorization, and prioritization of healthcare institutions’ needs, the definition of inter-institutional coordination mechanisms, and the early notification of volunteer orthopedic and traumatology specialists has the potential to enhance resource optimization in disaster response efforts. In this context, the coordination and management software platform is developed in order to facilitate the rapid coordination of healthcare institutions upon disaster occurrence, ensuring timely communication with specialists and minimizing the time required to deliver critical healthcare services in the affected areas. Featuring a map-based interface, the platform is designed to be user-friendly and incorporates rule-based assignment algorithms to effectively address the healthcare needs of disaster-stricken regions

References

[1] Dedeoğlu N. Afetlerde Sağlık Hizmetlerinin Yönetimi ve Organizasyonu. Toplum ve Hekim 2011; 348:365-17

[2] Gökmen MY, Uluöz M, Pazarcı Ö, Çiloğlu O, Varmış HO. Aftermath Türkiye’s double earthquake: detailed analysis of fracture characteristics and acute management from a level I trauma center. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2024;32:43-8

[3] Zhong S, Clark M, Hou XY, Zang YL, Fitzgerald G. Development of hospital disaster resilience: conceptual framework and potential measurement. Emerg Med Journal 2014; 31(11):930-938. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202282

[4] Pouraghaei M, Jannati A, Moharamzadeh P, Ghaffarzad A, Far MH, Babaie J. Challenges of hospital response to the twin earthquakes of August 21, 2012, in east Azerbaijan, Iran. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2017;11(4):422-430. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2016.153.

[5] Gainey CE, Brown HA, Gerard WC. Utilization of mobile integrated health providers during a flood disaster in South Carolina. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):432-435. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X18000572.

[6] Park CH, Johnston E. Determinants of collaboration between digital volunteer networks and formal response organizations in catastrophic disasters. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior 2019;22 (2):2019.

[7] Akbasli IT, Serin O. Digital response to physical crises: the role of an e-health platform in the 2023 Southern Turkey earthquakes. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024;18:e57. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2024.63.

[8] Gaebel J, Schreiber E, Neumuth T. The Emergency Medical Team Operating System - a vision for field hospital data management in following the concepts of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA Journal 2024;15(2):405-413. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-024-00361-9.