Abstract

The 2023 Turkey earthquake highlighted critical communication failures where GSM operators were disabled in many locations. Phoenix Signal, a patent-pending innovation, solves this problem with a tethered drone providing continuous high-speed internet for up to 500 users via an embedded access point. This reliable system, independent of fragile networks, ascends 90 meters and is generator-powered for 24-36 hours of operation, overcoming battery limitations. Messages and calls are relayed globally via satellite from the drones access point to a base stations Starlink® receiver. This innovation has the potential to speed disaster response and save lives.

References

[1] Yurdigül Y, Bayraktar R, Çil S. A study on Kahramanmaraş Earthquake survivors : “Social media platforms were more effectively used than the traditional media”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 2024,(66), 211-229.

[2] Ke SS, Wu BR, Hsu C. Damage assessment of mobile communication facilities subjected to major earthquakes. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2022, 45.6: 501-512.

[3] Akgül SK, Pazarbaşı B. Bir Depremin Yıkım Dalgaları. Hiperlink Eğitim İletişim Yayın Gıda Sanayi ve Pazarlama Tic. Ltd. Şti., 2024.

[4] Merwaday A, Guvenc I . UAV assisted heterogeneous networks for public safety communications. In 2015 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference workshops (WCNCW) IEEE, 2015, pp. 329-334.

[5] Guan M, Feng Z, Jiang S, Zhou W. Tethered Balloon Cluster Deployments and Optimization for Emergency Communication Networks. Entropy, 2024, 26(12), 1071.

[6] Saif A, Shah NSM, Alnoamani A, Ameen A, Curry E, Al Khattat VHF et al. Resilient Skies: Advancing Climate-Resilient UAVs for Energy-Efficient B5G Communication in Challenging Environments. In: 2024 4th International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA). IEEE, 2024. p. 1-7.

[7] Xu Z. Application research of tethered UAV platform in marine emergency communication network. Journal of Web Engineering, 2021, 20(2), 491-511.

[8] Matracia M, Saeed N, Kishk MA, Alouini MS. Post-Disaster Communications: Enabling Technologies, Architectures, and Open Challenges. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology 5 (2024): 219-229.

[9] Hanafi MH, Rahim MZ, Hamzah HH, Fadzulli F, Marwah OMF, Omar Z et al. Analysis of Battery-based and Direct Current Generator Drone Power System. IJETT Journal, 2024, 72 (5): 216-226.

[10] Papyan N, Kulhandjian M, Kulhandjian H, Aslanyan L. Ai-based drone assisted human rescue in disaster environments: Challenges and opportunities. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2024, 34.1: 169-186.

[11] Gomes T, Tapolcai J, Esposito C, Hutchison D, Kuipers F, Rak J.et al. A survey of strategies for communication networks to protect against large-scale natural disasters. In: 2016 8th international workshop on resilient networks design and modeling (RNDM). IEEE, 2016. p. 11-22.

[12] Glass TA. Understanding public response to disasters. Public Health Reports, 2001, 116.Suppl 2: 69.

[13] Dinçer AE, Dinçer NN, Tekin-Koru A, Yaşar B, Yılmaz Z. The impact of Kahramanmaraş (2023) earthquakes: A comparative case study for Adıyaman and Malatya. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 110: 104647.

[14] Tamer S. Evaluation of Flight Permissions of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Turkey. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 2022, 35: 616-624.

[15] Morote, ÁF. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030): A Before and After for Teaching Natural Risks. In: Geography Education and Explorations on Human Development and Culture. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025. p. 99-130.